AIS data underrepresents vessel traffic around coastal Scotland

The data gathered during research expeditions contributed to the study

Data gathered during expeditions on our research vessel, Silurian, have contributed to a new study investigating how accurate Automatic Identification System (AIS) data is in quantifying vessel traffic in coastal waters around Scotland.

Data recorded by Silurian's AIS receiver and counts of vessels conducted by citizen scientists during research expeditions contributed to the study, which showed only 43% of vessels in coastal regions transmitted AIS. This means there are twice as many boats out there than show on AIS, meaning vessel traffic and and it's associated impacts are not being fully accounted for in policies to manage and mitigate the impacts on marine life.

Over half of Scotland’s coastal vessels go untracked

Over half of vessels operating in Scotland’s coastal waters are effectively “invisible” to standard maritime tracking systems, according to a new study led Heriot-Watt University. This lack of visibility poses significant risks to marine life, safety, and sustainable ocean management. The researchers found that only 43% of vessels within 10 km of the Scottish coast broadcast an Automatic Identification System (AIS) signal, the standard tool used globally to monitor ship movements.

Citizen scientists from Shetland to Arran took part

The study, which relied on over 1800 hours of land and sea surveys conducted between 2019 and 2024, covered nine of Scotland’s 11 marine regions and showed huge regional and seasonal disparities in AIS visibility. It was published in the academic journal Marine Policy. Much of the data was collected by citizen scientists from several organisations; volunteers were trained to follow a standardised method to survey and quantify ships. Volunteers from the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Shorewatch in Shetland, the Hebridean Whale and Dolphin Trust and the Community of Arran Seabed Trust all participated.

This data challenges the assumption that we can rely on AIS to tell us what’s really happening in our coastal seas.

In some areas, over 75% of vessel activity goes unrecorded.
— Dr Emily Hague from Heriot-Watt’s School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society

Scotland’s regions tell different stories

The study highlighted significant regional variations. In the Outer Hebrides, only 20% of vessels observed were transmitting AIS data, despite the area being a hotspot for eco-tourism, fishing, and aquaculture. The Orkney Islands showed a higher rate, with 58% of vessels broadcasting. In the Forth and Tay, home to some of Scotland’s busiest ports, AIS coverage reflected true traffic only 8% of the time, raising questions about underrepresented commercial and recreational traffic. Smaller vessels, such as fishing boats under 15m, recreational craft, and jet skis, accounted for much of the missing data. They are not legally required to carry AIS, but could voluntarily install and broadcast data.

Accurate data essential to gauge impact on Scotland’s marine life

Dr Hague said: “AIS data is used by governments, conservation bodies and researchers to model vessel-related impacts such as underwater noise pollution, whale and dolphin collision risk, anchor damage to seabed, greenhouse gas emissions and climate impact.

“But if over half of vessel movements in inshore waters are missing, existing models may be severely underestimating these impacts. This could lead to inadequate management, conservation and safety policies.”

Dr Lauren McWhinnie from Heriot-Watt University said: “Scotland’s coasts are a vital habitat for species like bottlenose dolphins, minke whales and orca. Without accurate data, it’s difficult to assess and mitigate threats to these species.”

Coastal communities would benefit from better data

The research doesn’t just highlight a gap—it offers a path forward. The authors suggest that where there are high volumes of non-AIS vessels, AIS data should be supplemented with other tracking methods, such as land-based observations and citizen science, to build a complete picture.

Dr McWhinnie said: “Ideally, even smaller vessels would broadcast their position using AIS. Improving data will benefit coastal communities, providing information that will allow them to balance tourism and other vessel-based activities with local sustainability and environmental objectives.

It will also enable researchers and conservation groups to provide better evidence when it comes to measures for protecting marine life. With an improved understanding of the activities and movement of different types of vessels, marine planners and policymakers could tailor regulations to maximise their potential effectiveness. The wider maritime sector could further benefit through improved safety and awareness.”

Carole Davis, a volunteer for WDC Shorewatch in Shetland, said: “I was pleased to be involved with this research as I thought that the additional data obtained would hopefully provide more detailed information on the potential impact of vessels, and would help to increase awareness of the importance of citizen scientists in marine research.”

NAVIGATING BLIND

The study recommends applying correction factors when using AIS to model coastal impacts, taking into account local vessel type, region, and season. Until universal tracking is possible, the researchers argue, such adjustments are crucial to avoid blind spots in maritime governance and any AIS-based risk assessments. Dr Emily Hague said: “We need transparency at sea. Scotland’s blue spaces are getting busier and without better data, we’re navigating blind when it comes to understanding the potential impacts.”

The research was published in Marine Policy and the full paper can be read here.

This research was conducted as part of the Scottish Vessel Project and Emily Hague's PhD at Heriot-Watt University. We would like to extend our sincere thanks to Emily, as well as all the contributors and citizen scientists that made this study possible.

HWDT is proud to have contributed to this collaborative research effort, which highlights the importance of long-term monitoring. By combining technology with citizen science, projects like the Hebridean Cetacean Research Programme help build a clearer picture of human activity at sea providing the evidence needed to inform stronger protection for marine life in Scotland's coastal waters.

Every data point collected during our research expeditions is important. Together, they help us better understand and safeguard the incredible wildlife found in our seas.

Anyone can join a research expedition. Book today to secure a berth in 2025 (limited availability remaining).

Together, we can ensure that whales continue to thrive in Scotland’s seas.